Jip Van Assendelft vs Twan Van Zijl Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Assendelft vs Zijl analysis and find out who is favored!
Jip Van Assendelft vs Twan Van Zijl Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Assendelft 0 - 0 Zijl
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Assendelft has won 40.74% of points on their second serve, while Zijl has won 46.75%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Assendelft, in recent form, has won 60% of their opponent's second serve points, while Zijl has won 49.07%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.16% and 30.88% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Assendelft has saved 62.5% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Zijl has saved 52.08% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Assendelft has won 63.64% of matches played (W/L 7/ 4), with Zijl winning 53.85% (W/L 21/ 18) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Assendelft has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 12/ 10), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 2/ 3). Zijl has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 26/ 15), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 41% (W/L 11/ 16).
- Player level: In the last year, Assendelft has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 63.64% of matches (W/L 7/ 4), where as Zijl has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 53.85% of matches (W/L 21/ 18). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Assendelft has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Zijl has played against players with an average rank of 9.36.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Assendelft has won 100% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Zijl has won 70% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Assendelft has converted 42.86% of breakpoint opportunities, and Zijl has converted 50% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
Form
49% (24-25)
Career Total W/L
54% (37-31)
33% (1-2)
YTD W/L
50% (9-9)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
![banner](https://matchstat.com/assets/images/matchstat-banner.webp)
The Best Odds For Jip Van Assendelft vs Twan Van Zijl For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Assendelft VS Zijl
Assendelft VS Zijl H2h Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Jip Van Assendelft | Twan Van Zijl |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 33% (1/2) | 50% (9/9) |
Sets Win/Loss | 29% (2/5) | 45% (19/23) |
Games Win/Loss | 45% (34/41) | 50% (208/211) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 64% (7/4) |
Clay Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 29% (2/5) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.14 | 0 |
Aces Total | 5 | 1 |
DFs per game | 0.32 | 0.02 |
DFs Total | 12 | 5 |
Avg Match Time | 1:2:40 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 59% (79/133) | 79% (295/372) |
1st Serve W% | 65% (51/79) | 54% (158/295) |
2nd Serve W% | 41% (22/54) | 47% (36/77) |
BPs Won% Total | 43% (3/7) | 50% (10/20) |
Return Pts W% | 38% (46/121) | 37% (116/312) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 33% (1/2) | 50% (9/9) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 33% (1/3) | 50% (9/18) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 20% (1/5) |
Deciding Set W% | 100% (1/1) | 83% (5/6) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (6/6) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (6/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 25% (12/3) |
Jip Van Assendelft Recent Matches Played
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 |
![]() ![]()
Jip Van Assendelft
Player
Leonardo Mileikowsky
67%
(
49 of
73)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 4-6 10-7 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Liam Branger
Player
Jip Van Assendelft
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve %
50%
(
30 of
60)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
7
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | |||
R1 | 6-2 7-5 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Stijn Paardekooper
Player
Jip Van Assendelft
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve %
69%
(
38 of
55)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
86%
(
12 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
15%
(
6 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Jip Van Assendelft
Player
Matyas Fuele
49%
(
34 of
70)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
4
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
4
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Jip Van Assendelft
Player
Jack Loge
58%
(
52 of
90)
1st Serve %
66%
(
52 of
79)
6
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
3
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
38%
(
34 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
34 of
79)
90
Total Points Won
79
|
4-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-2 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Twan Van Zijl Recent Matches Played
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Gilles Arnaud Bailly
Player
Twan Van Zijl
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
77%
(
36 of
47)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Michiel De Krom
Player
Twan Van Zijl
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve %
83%
(
43 of
52)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
57
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Twan Van Zijl
Player
Brian Bozemoj
77%
(
100 of
130)
1st Serve %
56%
(
57 of
101)
0
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
9
62%
(
62 of
100)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
42 of
57)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
42%
(
55 of
130)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
101)
115
Total Points Won
116
|
4-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | |||
Q2 |
![]() ![]()
Maxim Zhukov
Player
Twan Van Zijl
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
78%
(
61 of
78)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
44%
(
28 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
78)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-5 7-6(7) | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Assendelft Vs Zijl Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Assendelft are available here and Zijl photos here.
![Assendelft Zijl H2h Summary Stats 4th July 2024 Assendelft Zijl H2h Summary Stats 4th July 2024](https://matchstat.com/captures/ms/atp/Jip-Van-Assendelft-Twan-Van-Zijl-h2h-profile.webp)
![Jip Van Assendelft Twan Van Zijl Prediction Stats Jip Van Assendelft Twan Van Zijl Prediction Stats](https://matchstat.com/captures/ms/atp/Jip-Van-Assendelft-Twan-Van-Zijl-h2h-stats.webp)